Skip to content

Stem Cell Comments Followup

June 3, 2009

NIH Reviewing Comments on Obama Funding Embryonic Stem Cell Research

by Steven Ertelt, Editor

June 2, 2009

Washington, DC ( — The National Institutes of Health is reviewing tens of thousands of public comments submitted about its plan to implement President Barack Obama’s decision to force taxpayers to fund embryonic stem cell research. The public had just over one month to submit comments for or against its plan.

Obama decided to overturn the protections President Bush put in place providing hundreds of millions of dollars in funding to adult stem cell research but not making citizens pay for the destruction of human life.

In April, the National Institutes of Health released the proposed guidelines that implement Obama’s decision.

NIH director Raynard Kington has confirmed the agency received more than 20,000 comments four days before the deadline. The National Committee for a Human Life Amendment, which ran a campaign opposing the NIH guidelines, directed 9,436 comments to NIH from its web site opposing them.

NIH confirmed that more than 48,000 were received by the deadline.

Dr. Lawrence Tabak, acting NIH deputy director, said the agency would “develop the guidelines as expeditiously as possible” but it is required to meet a July 7 deadline President Obama put in place.

The agency began accepting comments after Obama issued his executive order on March 8, but the official comment period was shorter and came under criticism.

After President Bush’s executive order, NIH put a 60-day comment period in place and then extended the period an additional 28 days. However, NIH closed off public comments on Obama’s order on Tuesday, May 26, which upset a collection of pro-life groups that submitted reaction on the last day.

“A mere 34-day comment period does not afford interested parties an adequate opportunity to comprehensively review and comment on the Guidelines-especially given the scientific complexity and ethical ramifications of the Guidelines,” the groups wrote.

“[T]he inadequate comment period precludes the NIH from having sufficient information to engage in informed rulemaking,” the pro-life groups added.

Although the public comment period has ended, the nation’s Catholic bishops are continuing their campaign to educate the public about what Obama has done.

Deirdre A. McQuade, the pro-life spokeswoman for the bishops, told the Catholic News Service that pro-life advocates also need to contact their members of Congress and urge them to support ethical research.

She and other pro-life leaders are worried Congress will adopt a bill that would overturn the Dickey-Wicker amendment, a law that prevents the purposeful creation and destruction of human life for research. The NIH guidelines would only fund the destruction of so-called “leftover” human embryos for dubious scientific study.

The NIH guidelines describe the conditions and informed consent procedures that would have been required during the derivation of human embryonic stem cells for research using these cells to be funded by the NIH.

The guidelines also contain a long list of informed consent procedures and make it so parents know and agree to how the human embryos will be killed and used in scientific experiments. They only apply to research involving federal funds and do not affect research involving state funds or private dollars.

The guidelines also divert funds away from promising adult stem cell research that is treating people now who have one of over 100 diseases or conditions.

They create a financial incentive for the creation of more human embryos to be destroyed to obtain their embryonic stem cells.

The guidelines also do not require any separation between an in-vitro fertilization doctor and an embryonic stem cell researcher. They say they “should” be separate, but only when practical. As a result, the Obama guidelines allow any IVF doctor to create more human embryos than are needed for fertility purposes in order to generate more so-called “leftover” embryos for embryonic stem cell research using taxpayer funds.

Source: Please visit that source to find links to articles related to portions of the article above.

One of those links goes to and that leads to  Both of those mention legislation by Rep. Diana DeGette that will counteract the effectiveness of the Dickey-Wicker law. I don’t have time to explain these things, so please read about them yourself, and keep alert to any attempts to render the Dickey-Wicker policy ineffective. Here’s just a quick bit about it:

Douglas Johnson, a spokesman for the National Right to Life Committee, also talked with about the impending battle.

“This sets the stage for an attack on the Dickey-Wicker law,” he says. “Any member of Congress who votes for legislation to repeal this law is voting to allow federal funding of human embryo farms, created through the use of human cloning.”

The Dickey-Wicker law prohibits the creation of embryos for the purpose of research as well as any research that harms an embryo, a unique human being after conception.

Here is a link to new educational material from the USCCB regarding stem cell research:

This link goes to the comments submitted by the USCCB to the NIH:

And notice that the NCHLA still has its Grassroots Action Center set up for you to contact your legislators:$AID=970:SITEID=-1:VV_CULTURE=en-us:APP=GAC:ISSUEID=17646$.

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: